I’m more than confident that the tuner is not to blame, as I said earlier it’s my belief I’ve sped up a process rather than cause it. My gen1 was up on power and no issues for more than double the miles this one achieved.
There’s 2- 3 well respected tuners in the UK and it’s one of them and the fact the cars back with them for the new engine should show my confidence in them. I am aware of stock cars having failed so it’s more of an issue than just blaming people who modify.
First of all, I’m sorry for this happening to you, and at the same time, hat off to you because you are openly discussing the topic in public. Most people do not.
The reality of mapping these cars is that is still not a very well known engine, and not all ecu tables have been enabled to be tuned properly with certain safety margins that the oem ecu and map do have. At least it was like that until a few months ago on ecutek.
Plus, being an auto, it is really uncharted territory especially if it was used as a development car. Furthermore, development cars should be owned by tuners themselves, so if something goes wrong is all on them not on the customer, but that’s me. The fact that after an engine is blown and they (the tuner) will still profit on making/fitting the new engines tells the story itself.
Materials have memory, in this case where the engine did not break on a high-load situation does not mean the culprit was not the map itself. If the engine has been working outside design temp ranges, cooling has been altered an so on, for a certain amount of miles, that will shorter the lifespan of said engine, and sooner rather than later it will pop.
I’m pretty sure that if the car would have been running the stock map, the engine would still last to this day, with the same use.