So this
quoted post linking to an article trying to dismiss any relevance of a few litres IC volume it states:
"
In REALITY, airflow out the turbo travels at f***ing HUNDREDS of miles per hour, and airflow in to the engine consists of HUNDREDS of litres per f***ing second"
So I went away and made some calculations. Anybody have better ones, let me know....
A GR Yaris at lowish revs where you can actually want response, say 3000rpm for easy calculation, that gives 50revs/second. At 0,8l/rev displacement, the volume flow in the IC is 40 litre per second. On a 53mm pipe that is 40 mph. Hundreds being at least 200, he is off by factor 5. Perhaps volume flow is correct on a 8l Viper engine that has been turbocharged, but that wasn't the subject of his article either... So writing f*cking and capitalising doesn't make you right...
So I went about trying to make a reasonable assumption how much lag we are talking about between IC systems, assuming both can cool to similar IAT and one is big pipes and core with low pressure drop, one optimised for low volume. Comparing for the same boost, the smaller one will make ballpark 10hp less, the larger one can probably take more boost but now we are comparing all else the same and usually people will prefer the bigger one as bigger is better, right?
Assuming volume on one IC system is 8l and another is 16l with pipes 1,4x the diameter and a bigger core. If we're boosting 1,5 bar, these pipes will need to be filled with another 12 respectively 24l of pre-turbo atmospheric air, or 12l difference. This difference is filled by the transient between steady state pre-turbo flow of 40lps (no boost) and 100lps (=1,5 bar boost @40lps post-turbo) = on average 70lps air.
12l/70lps=0,17s.
This is 0,17s difference assuming both IC's are sufficient to cool to similar IATs.
However it isn't that simple, this is on top of the time it takes the turbo to up its pre-turbo atmospheric flow from 40lps to 100lps, and boost builds as a result of boost, that is, the turbo system is a reinforcing system: bit more boost means more combustion, more revs, which gives in turn gives more boost again, more combustion, more revs more boost etc. So the real difference will probably be larger as the larger volume to fill puts a delay on building boost. How much, don't know depends on so many things. On the other hand the larger system has a lower pressure drop but we talking no more than ballpark 0,05bar difference at these flows so not hugely significant on 1,5bar (3%), while the lag is ballpark 30% difference.
Let's settle for 0,2s difference in lag ballpark.
Will you notice it?
If you're driving a very twisty road with limited view with full throttle applications of 1-2s at a time, a difference of ~0,2s in boost build-up will definitely make a big difference.
If driving on track and you already know whats coming and you just apply throttle ~0,2s earlier and keep it WOT for 20s after that, you'll definitely have more use of the added power (potential) a bigger IC system gives.