I understand your point. However, the method is quite well thought out. It is designed to not punish the people already in ICE cars historically, e.g. in Sweden the average car is like 15 years old. Even higher taxes on fuel would punish too many disproportionately, often not in a place to buy a new car. And that is what these taxes are designed to do, to stop new combustion cars to come to market that will live and need to be fuelled 20-30 years into the future, a very long time. In this manner, a huge future emissions are displaced. It is effective for our societal goals.
Like I said before, unfortunately we have made our hobby out of what in essence is a transportation system, designed to move people, not necessarily to provide entertainment to the masses. And for 99% of transportation, imho, burning precious and dangerous liquid minerals into our atmosphere is a pure waist, no specific joy is derived from that act and it is very destructive and should thus be limited. It hurts us enthusiast but at large, at a system, it is a necessary evil, change at this scale is never easy. And in some cases, like France, the incentives are disproportionate...
Slightly unpopular opinion on a car forum I know, I am ambivalent about it too...