Are Litchfields doing your remote mapping? I went with them and it was finalised on revision 6 within a week.
GR Yaris The EcuTek thread
- Thread starter Onehp
- Start date
You guys are getting 6 revisions?! I got a base file which was doing some very weird part throttle things whilst data-logging then one revised file afterwards (Eventuri + HKS GPF back)
Bronson
Totally Hooked
Just back from trying the 6th map from Whifbitz. Feels better every time!
TheManWithTheStick
Totally Hooked
I'm on rev. 5 from Litchfield since having it for two weeks, it's taken longer than expected with Iain and myself being busy for parts of that time.
Just out getting a datalog and expecting the next to be my final map.
If you’re doing the mapping through Litchfields give Iain a call, they’re very friendly and helpful
Hmm I’ll have to give them a call. I did email Iain as initially he was very helpful with the first revision but since then no response to any emails. I assumed you only get one tweaked file but if you guys are having multiple revisions…
Just checking but have you sent your data logs back to Litchfield via the App?
Yeah done that and received a revised file along with some other changes such as the high power map is now position 1 etc but nothing since. Will give them a call.
- Dec 27, 2021
- 1,703
- 2,834
Target is 1.5 bar, here's a couple of pulls showing the target and actual boost.
This wasn't on my final map, but in the file I sent after the base map was loaded, but with such a mild overshoot I presume we're looking at wastegate inadequacy more than anything else.
This wasn't on my final map, but in the file I sent after the base map was loaded, but with such a mild overshoot I presume we're looking at wastegate inadequacy more than anything else.
is that boost sensor 1, via laptop or app ? if im reading mine right its a lot more than 1.5
TheManWithTheStick
Totally Hooked
Is anyone monitoring MT temperature via Ecu Connect at all? I notice it reads higher than engine oil temp after driving for some time.
Before getting this I had a Torque Pro dashboard via OBDlink MX dongle and the PID used for gearbox temps in that always reads below engine oil temp.
I'd assume Ecutek got it right, but after driving hard for some time it loops around to a negative value!
(Excuse the cluttered dashboard, still playing and barely any clue what I'm doing)
I asked Ecutek and they said they'll check with their GR but have heard nothing since.
Before getting this I had a Torque Pro dashboard via OBDlink MX dongle and the PID used for gearbox temps in that always reads below engine oil temp.
I'd assume Ecutek got it right, but after driving hard for some time it loops around to a negative value!
(Excuse the cluttered dashboard, still playing and barely any clue what I'm doing)
I asked Ecutek and they said they'll check with their GR but have heard nothing since.
Please do. 1,65 looks reasonable.Well, that’s absolute pressurebut yes, it looks set for 1.65 bar.
I’ll maybe do another log with the final map.
RichM
Obsessed member
I'm also using Torque Pro PID and at c70deg from memory on fast road use. Interested to know which read is right, as there is obviously quite a difference between the two.
im on 7th now
Would you mind sharing what issues you’re having please that requires 7 revisions?
Bronson
Totally Hooked
Same here, sent to me yesterday, first time I’ve been asked to do cruise and idle logs as well as full throttle.
I've not drivin the car properly to notice any issues, I just presume it's small tweaks now hopefully done soon
