GR Yaris (Gen 2) GR Yaris Mk2 (MY2024->)

Did short test drive with mk2 manual. Engine is impressive in mk2. Much better mid range. Or lets say its much more refined than in mk1 that feels more of a old turbo car.
Would be fun to test mk2 software if it is only software that has been changed, or has the boost control mech also improved.

IMG_5903.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Did short test drive with mk2 manual. Engine is impressive in mk2. Much better mid range. Or lets say its much more refined than in mk1 that feels more of a old turbo car.
Would be fun to test mk2 software if it is only software that has been changed, or has the boost control mech also improved.

View attachment 31222
I'm actually surprised by this. All reviewers say the same thing as well.
And still, nothing drastically changed to the engine, so I guess it's purely software related.
 
Oh no, GR Yaris AT is a boring daily. Not!

note the comment
"Unfortunately, we feel that the new all-wheel drive software is set a little more neutral. Oversteer slides are no longer so controllable and corner exits are a bit understeer-y. But these are our first experiences. For the final conclusion, we will wait until we test the car in full use on snow and gravel!"
 
"Unfortunately, we feel that the new all-wheel drive software is set a little more neutral. Oversteer slides are no longer so controllable and corner exits are a bit understeer-y. But these are our first experiences. For the final conclusion, we will wait until we test the car in full use on snow and gravel!"

I wonder if that's because of AT, would love to get a review AT vs MT from guys who can drive like this and have plenty of GR Yaris experience.
 
Oh no, GR Yaris AT is a boring daily. Not!

Love the videos of these guys. No talking. Just pure skill and confidence at showing what a car can really do.
While I have no thoughts about trading mine I must admit that this video made the auto look pretty good to be honest. Clearly it doesn't stand in the way of having fun.

It reminds me about the automatics in the Lexus F models. Not necessarily super sharp in day to day driving but when you are pushing them they become very crisp and responsive.
 
In the end of the day, the car is a tool, useless if the operator has no skill.

And the DAT can be driven like a sequential, the objective difference in driving to a real sequential box in actual rally cars are non-consequential to forward progression. Obviously not talking about gear ratio optimisation, that's another subject, and budget... And disregarding that a whole era of rally cars had steering wheel paddle operated gearboxes...
 
Hi guys,

Not sure what the actual boost figures were for stock Gen1, but I am very surprised to see that my newly delivered Gen2 makes up to ~1.8bar, from ~4k rpm.

The graphics on Gen1 dash used to be in PSIx10, now it's in bar, so yes it really shows 1.8 bar ..

I need to finish the run-in period (I'm at 1200km now, so no hard drive yet, just a few WOTs yesterday), then I'll make some graphs of the boost over OBD diagnostics.
 
Hi guys,

Not sure what the actual boost figures were for stock Gen1, but I am very surprised to see that my newly delivered Gen2 makes up to ~1.8bar, from ~4k rpm.

The graphics on Gen1 dash used to be in PSIx10, now it's in bar, so yes it really shows 1.8 bar ..

I need to finish the run-in period (I'm at 1200km now, so no hard drive yet, just a few WOTs yesterday), then I'll make some graphs of the boost over OBD diagnostics.
I think the added boost is the trick for added power and nice mid range. how it goes on track environment with more heat (power doesn't come without it) is to be seen.
with valve springs mk1 maybe gets the same performance.
 
I think the added boost is the trick for added power and nice mid range. how it goes on track environment with more heat (power doesn't come without it) is to be seen.
with valve springs mk1 maybe gets the same performance.
Valve springs won't change performance, only allow more boost near redline but that's far beyond the mk2 280bhp
 
Hi guys,

Not sure what the actual boost figures were for stock Gen1, but I am very surprised to see that my newly delivered Gen2 makes up to ~1.8bar, from ~4k rpm.

The graphics on Gen1 dash used to be in PSIx10, now it's in bar, so yes it really shows 1.8 bar ..

I need to finish the run-in period (I'm at 1200km now, so no hard drive yet, just a few WOTs yesterday), then I'll make some graphs of the boost over OBD diagnostics.
What is the run in procedure? Wasn’t it 1,000km on the mk1?
 
I do not follow any specific procedure linked to mk2; I just avoid wide open throttle, running at stable rpms for prolonged time, etc.

I plan to finish the `run-in` period at around 1,500-2,000km - then oil change and let the fun begin!
 
I do not follow any specific procedure linked to mk2; I just avoid wide open throttle, running at stable rpms for prolonged time, etc.

I plan to finish the `run-in` period at around 1,500-2,000km - then oil change and let the fun begin!
Ah thought the official procedure had changed.
 
I do not follow any specific procedure linked to mk2; I just avoid wide open throttle, running at stable rpms for prolonged time, etc.

I plan to finish the `run-in` period at around 1,500-2,000km - then oil change and let the fun begin!
Stable rpms? Shouldn't it be varied up to 4000k?
 
After some busy days, here's my first take about my new Mk2 (manual, fridge white).

Mileage so far: 1177kms, mostly on highways, and still mostly in break-in mode.
So, it's really just a first shallow take, even if I pushed a bit more after passing the 1000kms on clock.

Overall impression on the road: to me it looks like a different car from the Mk1 in many ways, I feel like I need to master it almost from scratch before pushing it like I'd like to. But it happened to me with the Mk1 as well at first, so we'll see.

Going through the details now , with respect to Mk1.

Seat position: it's much better and comfortable than the Mk1's, at least to me.

Engine: stronger and very impressive on low and medium rpms.

Driving modes: during the break-in I admit I appreciated the ECO mode quite much; I'm not used to get to an average consumption of 14kms per liter on this car at my usual cruising speeds.

Clutch: heavier and harder to modulate.

Brakes: just one hard brake so far, due to a truck that tried to kill me. The braking power is still there, but it looks like it needs more force on the pedal to get to the all of it.

Steering: a bit heavier and with a better feeling, to me.

Suspensions: firmer and with a bit less feedback.

Gear: a bit more precise and firm, even if still less precise that the one of my Fiesta ST Mk8.

Dash: I liked it almost immediately after using it a bit.

ADAS: much less annoying than I feared, and even helpful sometimes (first time I say something like this about ADAS). No start-stop (it never turned off the engine at any stop), Cruise control with very smart settings (I left it on for most of the highway trips), ISA alerts at very low and negligible volume. LDA a bit more complex to turn it off (through setting menu, 3 clicks).

By now, my verdict about "Mk1 or Mk2" is: take (or keep) them both if you can, because I feel they offer experiences that are more different than I expected.
But I need more miles with the Mk2, on more proper roads, to say my actual last word about this.

Two problems that shouldn't be there on a new car like this one: the gear knob was loosely screwed, and the car pulls slightly to the right. This last thing particularly annoys me a bit, and I hope it will be neatly fixed soon, when I'll take the car to the dealer to have its first oil change done.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top