GR Yaris (Gen 2) GR Yaris Mk2 (MY2024->)

I actually disagree about it being a crap review. I found it refreshingly honnest from someone who is not a fanatic about these cars. She didn't have a clue what a GRY was so it was nice to get her first impressions as a complete outsider to the car.
Everyone on here knows just about everything about them. They own one and are eager to find out the latest scrap of detail on the new MK2.
She wasn't doing that. She had never driven one so she was looking at a £46k small hot hatch that said Yaris on the back. I think she said she was a Golf fan so will be used to much nicer / quality cabins which is fair enough.
She clearly wasn't impressed in those first few minutes and I agree that the new dash does look cheap and plasticky. I think Mk1 looks nicer.
She wasn't brought up with it and full of all the hype we have been and probably still are. She said what she thought and i generally agree as we all know that this car is all about the driving and not the cosmetics.
As time went by she started to giggle and laugh and I knew then that she had realised what this car is all about and nothing to do with the name and plastics. She said it needed an exhaust so she joined the club there. She started spotting the important things about it.
After a short drive she said she understood why people buy into this car so it didn't take long for her to say she was starting to understand all the fuss.
We see too many reviews and comments from people who are already obsessed with it. People who love it so much they won't accept someone saying not nice things about it.
I smiled watching her get converted. A normal driver meeting it for the first time and being won over by it. That was nice to watch her being slowly converted for the right reasons ------- fun!
I tend to agree about auto gearbox comments regarding local stop start commuting and manual for more fun but that is more opinion than a technical fact.
For once I watched the thoughts of a "normal" car fan who was seeing it for the first time rather than the endless well known influencers trying to make points over others. How many reviews do we watch where after One minute you think Oh, just the same old comments.
It was like letting my neighbour who keeps looking at it go out and have a go for the first time. He would probably say the same - a bit disappointing cabin quality for a £46k car but what a car to drive - I now get it why you have one. It re-enforces my belief that at £30k+ for the Mk1 - what a bargain we got as she and many of us wouldn't really see much difference other than about £15k+
I hope to see one next weekend when I am at the Goodwood Festival of Speed.
I really disagree with your comment. As a motoring journalist, you should never start with a review biased about a brand/model. I'm intrested in reviews from people who actually have experience with a lot of different cars. She's the kind of person that's blown away by Tesla acceleration...
 
I mean.. if someone is not blown away by Tesla acceleration something is wrong with them.

Sandervdw, you complained about brand/model bias and in the next sentence you added your own bias against electric vehicles. If you have right to do that, she can aswell. We are in a world where there are "motoring jurnalists" and there are people who dump you stats and are careful not to say anything so bad, that they wouldn't get invited next time. And there are youtubers which tell you their feeling about the event they attended. Both have their space and it's up to viewers to decide who to listen to and who not to. I also felt that review was genuine, she pointed things that my friends who own Golfs and Mercs would point out.

She was the only reviewer who actually complained about plastic, every other reviewer just expected it to be bad, because they have driven mk1 and have their expectations already set. I haven't owned a Yaris, so that information is welcome for sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sam and sim86
I mean.. if someone is not blown away by Tesla acceleration something is wrong with them.

Sandervdw, you complained about brand/model bias and in the next sentence you added your own bias against electric vehicles. If you have right to do that, she can aswell. We are in a world where there are "motoring jurnalists" and there are people who dump you stats and are careful not to say anything so bad, that they wouldn't get invited next time. And there are youtubers which tell you their feeling about the event they attended. Both have their space and it's up to viewers to decide who to listen to and who not to. I also felt that review was genuine, she pointed things that my friends who own Golfs and Mercs would point out.

She was the only reviewer who actually complained about plastic, every other reviewer just expected it to be bad, because they have driven mk1 and have their expectations already set. I haven't owned a Yaris, so that information is welcome for sure.
I own an electric vehicle ;). And I have driven a Model S (not plaid but P100D/Performance). Ofcourse that acceleration is amazing, but as anyone will say, that's a thing you do the first 1000km, and then you're getting bored of it, and the car isn't that good in anything else.
Compare this to eg. CarWow or Autogefuhl (both which dare to give negative comments imo), and there is a massive difference. They will also both mention cheap plastics, but won't go into to much detail as that's not what the car is about. And they will surely not base their opinion on the name of the brand/model.

And I also have friends who called me crazy when I said I was replacing the Porsche with a Yaris. Until the started reading into it. Nobody who is interested in this car, hasn't already researched about it. It's not a review of the new generation (eg.) Skoda Superb, which might be relevant for a lot of people, it's a review for the very niche of car enthousiasts.
 
Interesting read.

"We’re not sold on the direction of the update though. By refining the package in so many areas, the GR Yaris has lost some of the rallying DNA that made it so good in the first place. Don’t get us wrong, it’s a hoot to drive, with the playfulness of the old Ford Fiesta ST combined with the sort of composure and eagerness that Subaru Imprezas used to do so well. But it hasn’t got the pedigree of a Civic Type R, and with the price jump they’re now fighting in the same arena. Eek."
 
They say there will only be 2000 cars built per year. That is going to make it near impossible for the people to get one.
At the top of the article it says it can be leased for £449. How can a leasing company get one when loyal GRY owners on here are getting turned down?
They say it hasn't the pedigree of Type R. I think they are very different cars though for different buyers. How long will it be and what does it take before we can say it has its own pedigree.
 
Dead link
They say there will only be 2000 cars built per year. That is going to make it near impossible for the people to get one.
At the top of the article it says it can be leased for £449. How can a leasing company get one when loyal GRY owners on here are getting turned down?
They say it hasn't the pedigree of Type R. I think they are very different cars though for different buyers. How long will it be and what does it take before we can say it has its own pedigree.
That figure is for a mk1, and needs you to punt up best part of £5k initially too. There won't obviously be a car available, it's an old listing.

1720446789240.webp


The cheapest new one is also on a 9+47, so needs about £1,500 up front and £150 more per month 🤪

1720446873365.webp
 
Dead link

That figure is for a mk1, and needs you to punt up best part of £5k initially too. There won't obviously be a car available, it's an old listing.

View attachment 29362

The cheapest new one is also on a 9+47, so needs about £1,500 up front and £150 more per month 🤪

View attachment 29363
This is the link https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/tech...urned-off-for-good/ar-BB1pw2N6?ocid=sampleapp

"Audio chimes similar to seatbelt warnings, and haptic feedback – vibrations of the accelerator pedal – also feature on some models, such as Toyota’s 2024 GR Yaris."
 
Interesting read.

"We’re not sold on the direction of the update though. By refining the package in so many areas, the GR Yaris has lost some of the rallying DNA that made it so good in the first place. Don’t get us wrong, it’s a hoot to drive, with the playfulness of the old Ford Fiesta ST combined with the sort of composure and eagerness that Subaru Imprezas used to do so well. But it hasn’t got the pedigree of a Civic Type R, and with the price jump they’re now fighting in the same arena. Eek."
An odd review, all positive until the summary.
 
It’s very much the mk1 review with a few new paragraphs slotted in. Very odd for a big publication like TG.
And that’s what I find crazy about the ladies youtube video I posted the other day, she has a very small following yet has released a video and yet a big publication like top gear appear to have reviewed the press release.
 
In other news I can’t see an auto hold function for the automatic gearbox which is odd as the shopping version has it. The manual seems to not reference it either?
 
They say there will only be 2000 cars built per year. That is going to make it near impossible for the people to get one.
At the top of the article it says it can be leased for £449. How can a leasing company get one when loyal GRY owners on here are getting turned down?
They say it hasn't the pedigree of Type R. I think they are very different cars though for different buyers. How long will it be and what does it take before we can say it has its own pedigree.
The figure makes sense as in late 2023 the production of MK1 GR Yaris had dropped to 8 a day and that included the GRMN and Japanese RS (fwd) model as they share a line with the GR Corolla.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ecsrobin
In other news I can’t see an auto hold function for the automatic gearbox which is odd as the shopping version has it. The manual seems to not reference it either?
I have just bought that shopping version - New Yaris Cross as daily and the hold button is the first thing I press as I like how it holds the car for up to 3 minutes when the brake pedal is pressed for about 2 seconds. Having never driven an auto it has surprised me how much I enjoy driving it (CVT) and would have been a reason for me to get the auto GRY as one foot driving is so nice after 45 years of driving manuals. Shame if it hasn't got it but I don't think my CH-R had the button but still held for a while - but not fully sure!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ecsrobin
They say it hasn't the pedigree of Type R. I think they are very different cars though for different buyers. How long will it be and what does it take before we can say it has its own pedigree.

I'm not sure about the GRY and CTR being very different cars for different buyers. I cross-shopped my GRY with a CTR because they are both fun and engaging hot hatches that cost about the same in some markets, like Asia.

Both cars come with a manual transmission, which is a must for me and significantly narrows my choices.

Many people can't fathom the idea of a FWD being a great and fun platform, believing that fun can only be had with AWD and RWD. However, for open-minded enthusiasts who truly value engagement and precision handling, the new FL5 Type R is hard to ignore because it's just that good.

After test-driving both, I can confidently say the Type R is far more responsive and precise in the corners than the GRY, and it's still very lightweight compared to everything else out there.

The only reason I chose the GRY was its availability when I bought it last year. Had that not been the case, I would likely be driving the new Type R, which has a slight edge in sportiness and agility.

I'm still looking to get into the Type R sometime this year or next year. Owning both a GRY and CTR makes a lot of sense to me because of the nostalgia and the joy of having two modern sports cars with manual transmissions that are incredibly drive-focused. There's not much else out there for the money.
 
I'm not sure about the GRY and CTR being very different cars for different buyers. I cross-shopped my GRY with a CTR because they are both fun and engaging hot hatches that cost about the same in some markets, like Asia.

Both cars come with a manual transmission, which is a must for me and significantly narrows my choices.

Many people can't fathom the idea of a FWD being a great and fun platform, believing that fun can only be had with AWD and RWD. However, for open-minded enthusiasts who truly value engagement and precision handling, the new FL5 Type R is hard to ignore because it's just that good.

After test-driving both, I can confidently say the Type R is far more responsive and precise in the corners than the GRY, and it's still very lightweight compared to everything else out there.

The only reason I chose the GRY was its availability when I bought it last year. Had that not been the case, I would likely be driving the new Type R, which has a slight edge in sportiness and agility.

I'm still looking to get into the Type R sometime this year or next year. Owning both a GRY and CTR makes a lot of sense to me because of the nostalgia and the joy of having two modern sports cars with manual transmissions that are incredibly drive-focused. There's not much else out there for the money.
For the money of a GRY and a CTR, there is a lot out there :P
But I agree, FWD hot hatches can be great fun (but they can also be very boring). I owned a i30N and that car was just a blast to drive in. It wasn't the fastest around the track (which a CTR is, it's actually way faster than a GRY) but it's really fun and engaging to drive. The typical "it will understeer"-comment is highly overrated and written by people who have never driven a modern hot hatch.

But, a GRY and a CTR together cost about the same as a Cayman GT4, and well... the Cayman is better...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ecsrobin
For the money of a GRY and a CTR, there is a lot out there :p
But I agree, FWD hot hatches can be great fun (but they can also be very boring). I owned a i30N and that car was just a blast to drive in. It wasn't the fastest around the track (which a CTR is, it's actually way faster than a GRY) but it's really fun and engaging to drive. The typical "it will understeer"-comment is highly overrated and written by people who have never driven a modern hot hatch.

But, a GRY and a CTR together cost about the same as a Cayman GT4, and well... the Cayman is better...

It depends on where you’re located. In Asia, a brand new GRY and CTR together are roughly half the price of a Cayman GT4. In the US, a new CTR costs $45k, a GR Corolla costs $36k, while a GT4 starts at $106k, still $25k more than the combined price of the hot hatches.

A GT4 is only "better" as an all-out sports car. You can't daily it, and it's nowhere near as practical as a hot hatch.

The FL5 is probably the most practical hot hatch around. The most impressive part, in my book, is that it weighs a mere 1447 kg, which is astonishing for a car of its size (it’s massive and roomy).

In Japan, parts of Asia, and the US, both the GRY/GRC and CTR are absolute bargains. I realize that’s not the case in Europe.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Spirited