Good post
@GRWTF .
I'll add somewhat unpopular opinion as it goes against the deeply seated grain of standard performance thinking, where tyres that score higher grip in tyre tests
always equates to better.
The 'other' opinion is that this car becomes more 'performance' with lower peak grip but with more consistent grip, so one is more able to improve your near or on limit driving, and enjoy the cars handling as there are more opportunities to feel it move about. If this idea is even on the table also very much depends on what kind of driver you are and what expectations you have. It is in similar spirit that a Caterham on skinny tyres might actually be the 'best version' on the road, or that a base 911 might actually be the most enjoyable real world because you can use more of it.
Ollie from Top Gear, a journalist not immediately recognised by all as a proper driver but who on occasion has outdriven Chris Harris, wrote this in his long term report nr. 6:
"As it stands the GR Yaris has a great balance of speed and grip. Maybe too much grip, but no-one’s solution to that equation is ever to remove grip. Well, not since the GT86 arrived wearing Prius tyres. I wish people would see that as a performance upgrade. Instead the answer is always to add speed."
So my take is as follows. I don't look for highest grip tyres, but for less performance oriented tyres that get good points for handling and that are progressive when skidding. This isn't easy as almost never do tests look for this. For winter tyres, I look for tyres that have high snow and ice grip as you'll slide anyway but with not too high wet grip, so the difference/contrast between wet and slippery surfaces isn't too huge, here Nordic winter tyres fit my bill but I live in Sweden. Difference I would use them a larger part of the season.
For summer, I want a medium segment tyre with not so good dry grip but good progressive wet grip, again lowering the difference/contrast as one e.g. drives a road part wet part dry. For me currently all seasons tyres fit this bill best.
I know some members love their convenience pack Dunlops exactly because they aren't the highest grip and are apparently progressive in the wet (haven't tried).
While tyre choice like this maybe won't give the sense of endless grip or win laptimes, cornering speeds go from from very high to still high on this very capable car, but there are still more safe opportunities to come even close to limit handling where one can learn and feel the car better. It would be a mistake to think one would always drive slower, especially if conditions are less then ideal, i.e. real world. As I say, I rather drive a tyre with 80% grip at 100% ability, then a tyre with 100% grip at 80% of it's ability, equally fast. Of course the one on 80% has more grip reserve. On the other hand the former knows better where the limit goes, why the latter is driving more blind and is waiting to get caught out when the endless capability/grip finally runs out. So what actually happens, the higher grip tyre might actually drive faster but isn't a better driver because of that. So what is more fun and what is safer?
Actually this is a complex matter and safe driving is much more than tyre grip, but trying to illustrate that higher grip isn't necessarily always better.
Anyhow, this isn't necessarily 'advice' for the OP, more a musing and opening up of what constitutes 'best' on the inherintly very capable, borderline boring(?!?), chassi of this little rally car for the road. So to not derail this thread, if interested in exploring this avenue of thought, I made a new thread
https://www.gr-zoo.com/threads/lower-grip-tyres-discussion.596/